For this
semester’s formal film study, I chose to analyze films directed by Kathryn
Bigelow. Bigelow has always been a director that has fascinated me. Her bold
choices in the types of movies that she has been known to direct, as well as
her historical successes in the movie industry, place her in a field all her
own. I admire the fact that Bigelow has not only made a reputable name for
herself by being the first woman to win both an Academy Award for best picture
and best director as well as a Director’s Guild for best director, but that she
has done so through movie genres that are typically considered “male
territory.” Almost all of this artist-turned-director’s films are rooted in
themes of violence and intensity. Yet, I also found it interesting to discover
that Bigelow’s career extends beyond just directing to producing and
screenwriting too. This being said, the films that I chose to focus on for this
project were Zero Dark Thirty, The Hurt Locker, and Point Break.
I chose these films
in particular because each film was made in a very different time period of
Bigelow’s career. Zero Dark Thirty is no doubt Bigelow’s newest film made in
2012, followed by The Hurt Locker in 2008, and Point Break coming in much
earlier in 1991. Nevertheless, despite the time differences, there were many
similarities throughout. Yet, to me the most powerful and intriguing discovery
of all was Bigelow’s brilliant use of character development in order to convey
the passage of time in her films. In other words, through the connection that Bigelow
was able to create between the protagonist and the audience, it became much
more evident and real the immense struggle and time that each puts into their
given situation.
For instance, Bigelow’s
Point Break is a film about FBI agent Johnny Utah (played by Keanu Reeves) and
his search for the seemingly ghostlike crew, known as the ex-presidents, that
have been successfully robbing banks left and right. In his quest to nab the
robbers and follow a recent lead, Utah goes undercover as a surfer. Yet in the
process, Utah finds that he is frighteningly attracted to the life of these
adrenaline junkies and forms a sort of estranged friendship with the group’s
leader, Bodhi (played by Patrick Swayze). Through the trials that Johnny Utah
faces and his many failed attempts to finally learn to surf and become accepted
by the pack-like community, it is obvious that this case is more than just a
typical assignment for the rookie. He has invested a tremendous amount of time
and energy into it, and has to overcome many personal struggles in order to do
so. Because of the deep connection that we feel with Johnny, this seemingly
endless chase is truly portrayed as a monumental battle.
Similarly, in
The Hurt Locker, Bigelow follows the daily lives of an EOD team in Iraq. From
start to finish, the film is utterly captivating. The bond between the audience
and main characters is developed quickly as the team is forced to adjust to a
new leader after their first sergeant, Thompson, is killed in action. The new
staff sergeant, William James (played by Jeremy Renner), is a talented yet
somewhat reckless soldier that is not afraid to play by his own rules. His lack
of communication and willingness to follow protocol leads to early conflict among
the rest of the team consisting of sergeant JT Sanborn (Anthony Mackie) and
specialist Owen Eldridge (Brian Geraghty). However, in the midst of the trying
and deadly circumstances of war, and the pressure of their role as a bomb
disposal team, the group eventually finds common ground. Needless to say, through
cataloguing the team’s daily physical and emotional challenges, Bigelow is able
to perfectly capture the hell in which they are living. Each day is seemingly
endless and equally terrifying. By then end of their 38-day mission in Iraq,
one cannot help but feel as though those 38 days were nothing short of a
lifetime. SPOILER ALERT!!! Thus, at the end of the film when we see that James,
who is unable to cope with the transition back to normal life, is headed back for
another 365-day tour, the result is pure horror and shock. You are left
absolutely dumbfounded because you have seen first-hand the effect that only 38
days had on him previously. In this sense, the true weight and duration of war
is given an entirely new meaning that would have been impossible to convey
without such strong character development.
Finally, Zero
Dark Thirty chronicles the decade long search and eventual death of the al-Qaeda
leader responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Osama Bin Laden. Primarily,
the film dives into the work of a feisty and driven CIA officer Maya (played by
Jessica Chastain) who has been recruited to work on this case ever since her
graduation of high school. Maya’s fiery personality and unwavering certainty in
her lead, involving a suspicious and little known courier known as Abu Ahmed,
despite numerous defeats and setbacks succeeds in drawing the audience in and transforming
a historical milestone into a personal struggle. Thus, through seeing the effects
that this manhunt has on Maya and the many friendships and confidences it takes
away from her, you are better able to truly understand all of the sacrifice and
time that has gone into this mission. Zero Dark Thirty is definitely a powerfully
relevant film. This being said, it is my personal opinion, that this was
Bigelow’s weakest film in terms of character development. While the connection
is eventually made between the audience and Maya, I believe that it happens too
late. Unfortunately, I think that in this case, Bigelow made the slight mistake
of assuming that the content would speak for itself too much. I wish that she had
gone a bit farther in developing multiple characters so that the true duration
of this hunt could be fully appreciated.
In addition, to
this discovery, there are also many smaller similarities that all three movies
shared. For instance, there is the interesting and undeniable connection
between William James in The Hurt Locker and Bodhi in Point Break. Both are
considered huge daredevils and adrenaline junkies that thrive upon the dangers
of life even at the cost of those close to them. Next, there are many cases in
which it can be assumed that Bigelow is making a political statement through
her films. A perfect example is seen in Zero Dark Thirty. In this film, there
are many intense scenes in which we are given insight into the extreme torture
methods that the CIA used against captured detainees in order to obtain
information regarding Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda operatives. However, as the
film progresses, there is a large focus on the fact that these operatives are
not allowed to use such methods anymore. This is seen as controversial and even
perhaps a statement against anti-torture since much of the information they
received was pivotal in the search for Bin Laden.
Also, another
connection that I noted was Bigelow’s use of the absence of sound in particular
scenes to create suspense. For example, in the raid of Bin Laden’s compound at
the end of Zero Dark Thirty, there is hardly any sound besides that of the
shuffling feat of SEAL team 6. Then, all of the sudden, the silence would be
interrupted by huge bursts of gunfire. This huge contrast helped to create and
maintain the suspense throughout the raid. Also, in The Hurt Locker, there were
many times in which silence was used as well. For instance, in James’s first case
with his new team, he finds himself working on a bomb that ends up being much
larger than they originally suspected. During these moments of painstaking care,
all that can be heard is James’s labored breathing as he focuses on the work at
hand while struggling under the weight and heat of the protective suit that he
must wear.
In terms of the
camera, I also noticed that many times throughout the films, the scenes were
shot in a more documentary/hand-held style that allowed for increased and
unsteady movement. This was important because it helped the action scenes to
appear much more fast-paced and pivotal. For instance, this technique is used multiple
times in Point Break when Johnny Utah is chasing the ex-presidents. One such
scene that comes to mind occurs just after the crew hits another bank and
attempts to get away when Johnny and his partner Angelo take chase. Here, it is
obvious that Johnny has blown his cover and must try to capture the robbers at
all cost. The chase leads them through many winding and narrow alleyways and even
stranger’s houses. All the while, the camera is very unsteady so as to provide
a visual as if you were the one running. Also, the shots change very quickly and
show just enough background so that it is clear who is in the lead without
giving away what obstacle might be lurking just around the corner. Yet, as the
scene ends in the final moments of the chase, the use of an extreme close up on
the eyes of ex-president Reagan (Bodhi), slows down the pace and highlights the
strange connection between the two men.
In all,
Bigelow’s films are a wonderful combination of riveting action sequences with
powerful worldly meaning. I have thoroughly enjoyed having the opportunity to
finally explore her wonderful work. Her previous successes in the film industry
are no doubt well deserved and I can only presume that they are only the first
of many more yet to come.





Very nice work here, Hope. Very thorough, well-informed. You've found a lot of connections in her work, and I think it's very clear that you learned a lot about her style. I hope it was interesting and entertaining for you. I'm looking forward to what you'll do next for a Formal Film Study.
ReplyDelete